I wrote about my feelings of aversion to Palahniuk and the climate that surrounded my first experiences and affected them. You’re projecting a lot of your own feelings into what I was writing about, which were actually “my feelings”. I don’t think you have much of a place to come to my site and instruct me on how to construct an article to appease your taste. My suggestion is to learn about what you want elsewhere. If you found no place else that provided any information about the event, my alternate suggestions are to step it up in the research department or to simply be happy that you found some info that you were looking for in the middle of what I wanted to write about.

As far as Ed Norton is concerned, I don’t know what your point is or what you’re talking about. If Ed Norton just recently had his break out role as a neo-nazi or a magician before he made those films, then yes, it’s type casting. Check out Primal Fear which is based around him having a split personality. That’s a fairly specific role to play more than once so, as I stated in my original point, casting him kind of killed the element of surprise.

Besides – Ed Norton was type-cast in the film!?!? As a man battling split-personality disorder!? That’s crazy talk. I guess he’s also type-cast as a neo-nazi and a magician, I don’t know. And Fight Club was way better than Magnolia. Damnit all your opinionated nonsense has drawn me in, like the way Chuck says something absurd just so someone else will respond with stacks of contrary evidence! Bah!

In short, good job, but when you have something legitimately awesome to report, just report it and let it stand on its own.